The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
The pie graph illustrates the proportions of five types of energy produced in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, in the two years, the quantity of coal and gas were the largest productions of energy and rose slightly in 2005. Besides, the figure for the others witnessed a moderate decrease.
Being the largest production in 1995, the percentage of coal was 29.80 percent before growing minimally to 30.93 percent ten years later. Similarly, there was also a slight increase in the figure for gas from 29.63 percent to 30.31 percent in the 10-year timescale.
On the contrary, the amount of production in other sectors underwent a substantial improvement. While the figure was 29.27 percent in 1995, it dropped by just under 10 percent in the next ten years. On the other hand, nuclear and others accounted for 6.4 percent and 4.90 percent in 1995, respectively. In 2005, similarly, the two figures decreased by just above 4 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choicesTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 61
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- a 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, similarly, so, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05732484076 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67356640478 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7357335542 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2222222222 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114299897781 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556324166345 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536933466893 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895690319934 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04444956347 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.