There are two survey shows in this statement, first survey conducted by the Univesity of Waymarsh indicates that the citizens in this place felt like literary classics as they are reading. While in a second survey, the researchers found that in the pulbic libraries in this place, the mystery novel is the most popluar books among the lended ones. Thus the author concludes that the respondents in the first study garbled the citizens' reading habits. While the author does not provide us a compelling reason to support the conclusion, there are some loop holes in the studies. We need to reexamine them carefully.
To begin with, the first study is problematic. As the study shows us the preference of the people invetigated in this study, there is no supportive evidence to confirm the liabilities of their choice. Whether they were telling the true conditions is in question. On one hand, people who felt like the literary classics may be in favor of the other writing styles at the same time which means they could like the mystery novel at the same time with a high possiblity. In that people can have various tastes among novels. On the other hand, the literay classics which is on behalf of the higher taste of a person, is admired by some of people, maybe the just like this style to show their taste merely.
Let's delve into the second survey which is also problematic. As the study shows the condtion of lending books of the public libraries in Waymash, it indicated that people like mystery novel most. Firstly, the scale of the survey is inconsistent with the previous survey for the no one can promise the people borrowed books or just red them in the public libraries are the same ones investigated in the first study. Thus ths reslut of this study is not convincing. Secondly, the reaserchers merely examined the public libraries instead other ways of reading, they could not get a compelling evidence, likewise. In that people today have lots of ways of reading, the public libraries is only one of the way to get the books to read. Maybe the people can buy books in bookstores or online. Thirldy, the reason why they borrowed books from libraries maybe they are not in favor of the books in the libraries so much compared with their favors, if they really like a book, they can buy it instead of borrowing.
In all, the atuhor does not support the conclusion with convicing evidence. If the author want to make a further study, more convicing evidence is required. Firstly, the people investigated in the study should be confirmed. Secondly the author should make a wider suvery except for the public libraries, the book sotores both online and offiline should be studied.
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o 29
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 85
- The following appeared in an e-mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville."Over the past ten years, there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre product 89
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard ho 46
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 50
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 466 350
No. of Characters: 2175 1500
No. of Different Words: 194 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.646 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.667 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.364 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.261 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.86 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.652 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.46 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...st popluar books among the lended ones. Thus the author concludes that the responde...
^^^^
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ded ones. Thus the author concludes that the respondents in the first study garbl...
^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...onfirm the liabilities of their choice. Whether they were telling the true conditions i...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 627, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the people') or simply say ''some people''.
Suggestion: some of the people; some people
...higher taste of a person, is admired by some of people, maybe the just like this style to show...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...s style to show their taste merely. Lets delve into the second survey which is a...
^^^^
Line 6, column 416, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e ones investigated in the first study. Thus ths reslut of this study is not convinc...
^^^^
Line 8, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... study should be confirmed. Secondly the author should make a wider suvery except...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, likewise, may, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, except for, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 466.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7982832618 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46957205323 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43991416309 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3186929148 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2173913043 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2608695652 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 5.70786347227 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183540878031 0.218282227539 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051072255028 0.0743258471296 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052434181881 0.0701772020484 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112472033167 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695003553697 0.0628817314937 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.