Over the past decade, watching imported movies instead of domestic movies has become a prevalent and publicly phenomenon for many people. There are several reasons to explain for this phenomena as well as the government should improve there significant role in expanding the locally domestic film industries.
In the one hand, people are likely to watch foreign films because of the quality as well as the value that they have received from the movie. In fact, the quality of the imported movies are presented with the unique and spectacular scenes, particularly exciting sound effect. Such condition will certainly make people not only feel amazed and excited about the show, but also cultivate their imagination for predicting the film script. Besides, watching carefully invested film make people feel the greatly intensive sense of the movie since it was made with talented casts, uniquely content, and well-known directors, so the audiences will accrue useful knowledge as well as priceless value, thereby becoming more mature, and gaining new horizon for their life and their work.
On the other hand, government subsidy would play significant role for the development of domestic film industries. Firstly, apparently having more investment to equip modern facilities and equipment to making blockbuster movies such as high-quality cameras, visual and sound effects, hiring movie stars, in particular marketing to local audiences. Also, investing to Gray matter have a greatest contribution to the growth of movie industry by sending their talented produce filmmakers and actors to hollywood to learn special world class in order to upgrading their skills and abilities to making a world famous movie.
In conclusion, although a majority of people are inclining to foreign movies is an alarming situation. If the government subsidize their film industry by financial support, it will be a positive signal to repel that inclination.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...here are several reasons to explain for this phenomena as well as the government sho...
^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...es. Also, investing to Gray matter have a greatest contribution to the growth of ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45514950166 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71681993952 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611295681063 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3664735973 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.272727273 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228279572118 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896571489446 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582221303213 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147644146517 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364478931598 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.