Governments make many rules to protect people from danger, for example, by making people wear seat belts in cars or not allowing smoking in public places. However, many people believe that there are too many rules nowadays. To what extent do you agree with this
Rules and regulations are necessary for the well being of citizens. Government has the responsibility to maintain certain laws in order to protect the people from dangers of accidents or eradicate the possible consequences of smoking. Although it may consider by some that irrelevant, it should be weighed against the advantages.
To begin with, despite of having minor inconvenience due to many rules, it should be weighed against the safety aspect of the people and social beings. Hundreds of accidents occur due to drunken driving. Since there are many laws to control the driving under the influence of alcohol, it should be followed, even if it affects our freedom. Those who give more preference to their freedom, they should play with their own life and that of others. Similarly, smoking is not just create health issues among the smoker, but it also affects the people those who inhales the fume. If a pregnant woman smoke or inhale, baby may have serious congenital abnormalities. Hence, regardless of our inconvenience, we should follow laws which implemented for the welfare of humans.
In addition, littering and spitting is considered as serious offence in Singapore. For example, country like India not give much emphasis on public hygiene, that makes the Singapore become the most beautiful and cleanest city in the world. Since laws are not strict in India to keep surroundings neat and tidy, people would not follow the law.
However, having too much laws seems unnecessary. In such situations, people have the rights to raise their voice against such rules. Any sensible government will make alterations in the law, or even remove it.
In conclusion, in spite of our inconvenience, people should be followed rules because it is essential for the smooth functioning of any society. If these laws are absent, people will do a lot of harms and even they would not afraid of anything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | Varsha stha | 41 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | Ania | 88 | view |
- Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgeys on expensive medical technology and procedures. This money should be spent instead on health education to keep people well. To what extent do you agree with this 78
- Some people say that economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stopped immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both side and give your opinion. 78
- Few artists ever manage to achieve fame let alone a liveable wage Often artists struggle to make ends meet for most of their lives For this reason some people believe that it is irresponsible for a parent to encourage their child to pursue an artistic car 72
- Below is a line graph showing the incidence of mental illness as indicated by receipt of incapacity benefit amongst older UK males from 1971 2015 The reform in the benefits system took place in 1995 78
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we should follow laws which implemented for the welfare of humans. In additio...
^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... follow the law. However, having too much laws seems unnecessary. In such situati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, similarly, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1214057508 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75342647771 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584664536741 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5207488152 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221526230329 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610027949728 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445902108541 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12186970615 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195138918324 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.