Should education be free?
This is a controversial issue because it depends on many factors: the economy, politics, society of each country. In my opinion, free education is only suitable for developed countries, the rest should maintain the policy of socializing education and fee exemptions for poor people.
For developed countries, education free of charge is a form of investment priority for education. It does not affect the national budget but also benefits the economic development. It means that a poor student is also entitled to the same training as wealthy students. They have the opportunity to become great talented people who contribute to the nation, avoiding wasting the nation's gray matter or brain drain. When education is best invested, the country that owns the education will develop sustainably. Korea is a good example of a poor country that has become a world-developed country within 20 years due to investing in education. In addition, providing learning opportunities for everyone will also eliminate the gap and discrimination between the rich and the poor and bring about stable political security and prosperity for that country.
For poor countries, education socialization is a necessary policy to develop. Socialization of education is a process where both the community and society participate in. All organizations, families, and citizens have the responsibility to take care of the education career, coordinate with the school to implement the educational goals, build a healthy and safe educational environment. The socialization of education will contribute to reducing the burden of national budget invested for education. Diversifying training types and attracting more resources aims to improve the quality of education. However, in my opinion, these countries should maintain the policy of exemption and reduction of education fees, particularly for difficult people. Thus, everyone has opportunities to study, creating social justice. On the other hand, this also narrows the gap between the rich and the poor, avoiding distinguishing social class.
In short, tuition exemption and reduction policies should be applied completely or partially depending on the conditions of each country in each development phase. Some developed countries are now implementing this policy and strengthening intelligence for them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, in addition, in short, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.3376753507 360% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65527065527 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18990115128 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541310541311 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7364770675 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4736842105 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247949880793 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710967930786 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842460581096 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152919649534 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560610258689 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.