People should use public transport:
Transportation means are very diverse but divided into two main categories. Personal and public means. I totally agree with the idea that using public transport or restricting personal vehicles needs to be promoted because it benefits both individuals and society a lot.
Socially, the fact that using public transport such as buses and trams replacing personal transport vehicles such as cars and motorcycles is the best way to protect the environment and save maximum energy. Due to the high use of vehicles and motorbikes, the amount of dust and emissions from fuel for engines such as gasoline and oil increases in the air. This makes the air seriously polluted and makes the temperature of the earth rise, leading to the greenhouse effect, a globally challenging issue. Moreover, the consumption of this energy source also accelerates the exploitation of non-renewable resources, depleting natural resources. Besides, developed public transport also shows the image of a developed civilized country. In developed countries like Japan, we can see that most people use the subway, so cities do not have gasoline emission or dust. On the contrary, developing or underdeveloped countries are increasingly facing problems of traffic congestion and environmental pollution because of personal transport means.
Personally, every citizen can improve their lives when traveling by public transport. First, they improve their health by enjoying a healthy environment, avoiding bad weather such as rain, sun, and wind, limiting stress when driving vehicles and reducing risks of traffic accidents. Secondly, people also save on travel costs so that they can reduce personal expenses. Finally, these types of vehicles pose a great risk of industrial waste in the future, costs the State expensive to address these problems, leading to a reduction in the budget for social and educational welfare.
In short, the use of environmentally friendly public transport is the main trend of commuting habits of the people today because the benefits that it brings are undeniable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-05 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-17 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-13 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-07-23 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
Comments
I highly appreciate your
I highly appreciate your comments. Thank you very much.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, in short, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46875 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9352318371 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4428154173 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314022077458 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1058575141 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901809588693 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215614950208 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817838481513 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.