Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is true that some people argue that economic growth is the solely measure for global problems of hunger and poverty. The other part of world population, however, believe that the end of increasing economies would protect our environment. I completely agree with the latter opinion.
Those who consider economic growth as the only solution/cure for the tragedy of poverty propose one major argument. Only would the economic growth of developing countries provide the poor with the wealth to afford the basic needs of life. Companies’ profits which make contributions to this growth would trickle down in the form of financial benefits for the poor. This opinion has justified the age of imperialism and destroyed livelihoods of millions of citizens in the name of growth.
On the other hand, there are a variety of examples to support for the opposing view that economic growth is one of the main reasons leading to environmental destruction. Firstly, it is true for some developing countries, where tropical forests in lowland had been destroyed and unsustainable agricultural practices introduced to produce cash crop, usually for export. Secondly, this is also true for developed economies. For instance, the continued use of fossil fuels to provide energy for the industrialized development is resulting in the global warming. It leads to the sea level rise, which will eventually make millions of poor people in Bangladesh become homeless.
In conclusion, unsustainable economic growth must be stopped. If it is not based on meeting demands of human but making profits, this economic growth will only create more poverty and lead to more hunger in the world by destroying natural resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | codefree | 67 | view |
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1990 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 diffirents age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000 73
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in thrèe different countries in the U.S state of oregon. 56
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 78
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etely agree with the latter opinion. Those who consider economic growth as th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
... of poverty propose one major argument. only would the economic growth of developing...
^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...orm of financial benefits for the poor. this opinion has justified the age of imperi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of citizens in the name of growth. On the other hand, there are a variety o...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople in Bangladesh become homeless. In conclusion, unsustainable economic gr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36162361624 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92576880358 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586715867159 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1502536568 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245539236811 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936358773346 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809013166443 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170520549821 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585123506655 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.