some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Currently some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but other think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money. For this, iam more inclined to agree for do not spend money just to keep wild animals away
It is important that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money. It is because animal extinction is a natural thing. There are natural extinctions that occur throughout compilation at certain times and environments, randomly, nature selects species that are less able to adapt to changes in their environment. For example, currently animals are still threatened with extinction as the government conserves wild animals. extinction is a natural thing and is a life cycle or evolution in which when a species dies a new species will emerge, and it will continue and evolve as time passes and no one can change it, even though the government is conserving endangered animals .
In conclusion, the government does not need to spend money just to preserve wild animals, the government simply needs to make a policy about preserve habitats for animals and then apply and stretch them clearly and clearly.
On the other hand if the government carries out animal conservation, the government must think first in terms of the environment, humans and animals themselves, because treatment of animals and animal and environmental life patterns is highly dependent and each animal has their own environment, for example, preservation animals have now been threatened but the threat of extinction is still a public concern, such as passenger pigeons, tigers or animals such as orangutans in Kalimantan, Komodo dragons are threatened with extinction even though the government has made national parks and native Komodo dragons, the most worrying because they are endangered, the number Sumatran tiger sub-species are only around 300-400 only living in the wild. The large amount of illegal oil palm land clearing has disturbed tiger habitat. In fact, the population is estimated to be destroyed in 2050 then if the government spends money only on conservation demonstrations without considering the natural selection system, and human life patterns then it will only waste money in vain. There are still many other things that can be done to protect animals without spending money.
In conclution, it would be better if the government think before about to protect the wild animals, because many benafits are comparable to losses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | jasminabts | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sutriani | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sutriani | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-22 | Ranjit Singh | 92 | view |
- the chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 67
- The chart below show the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational sitting in UK in 2010. 67
- some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money. Discuss both views and give your opin 73
- some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money. Discuss both views and give your opin 67
- The pie charts show information on the proportion of carbohidrates, protein, and fatin three different diets 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...For this, iam more inclined to agree for do not spend money just to keep wild an...
^^
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., iam more inclined to agree for do not spend money just to keep wild animals aw...
^^
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wild animals away It is important that extinction of wild animals is a natural ...
^^
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Extinction
... the government conserves wild animals. extinction is a natural thing and is a life cycle ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 723, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ernment is conserving endangered animals . In conclusion, the government does not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 8.3376753507 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26811594203 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79655761684 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48309178744 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 173.745743353 49.4020404114 352% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.75 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 20.7667163134 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.530060454864 0.244688304435 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224108163257 0.084324248473 266% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.210363096219 0.0667982634062 315% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32848510198 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190721280773 0.056905535591 335% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.