some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Animals play a crucial role in maintaining the ecological balance of earth. Some people opine that government should invest money to protect endangered animals where as other's say that extinction is a natural phenomena, so the money should be used for more productive activities rather than spending it on protection of wild animals.
To embark upon, research shows that animals have marked their existence even before the beginning of mankind and many of them have become extinct. Though, certain species have vanished from earth's surface leading to disruption in ecosystem, from recent repots and discoveries, it is evident that they have either evolved or been replaced by other species to maintain the balance. Eventually, this highlights that extinction is a natural process and it has continued since million years. Therefore, some individuals suggest that goverment should halt squandering money on protection of endangered animals and invest the same for the growth of mankind.
However, if these endangered animals are not protected then our future generations might not know their significance and get their glimpse. Also, every animal has their own importance in food chain. For example, herbivores intake is dependent on plants. These herbivores further become prey for carnivores and this process continues. If, herbivores becomes extinct due to decrease in supply of plants, in contrast, the risk of carnivores getting endangered also increases. Hence, government should spend certain amount for protection and well being of endangered species as well as other animals to prevent extinction.
In conclusion, it is true that extinction of animals can't be stopped but can be delayed by pouring in some efforts and funds. At the same time, care should be taken to plough sufficient amount of money for betterment of mankind rather than investing a hefty amount for protection of animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | jasminabts | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sutriani | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sutriani | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-22 | Ranjit Singh | 92 | view |
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sh 79
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at l 73
- some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money Discuss both views and give your opini 73
- The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...balance of earth. Some people opine that government should invest money to protec...
^^^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...est money to protect endangered animals where as others say that extinction is a natura...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...where as others say that extinction is a natural phenomena, so the money should b...
^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
...thers say that extinction is a natural phenomena, so the money should be used for more p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ertain species have vanished from earths surface leading to disruption in ecosyst...
^^
Line 4, column 474, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ural process and it has continued since million years. Therefore, some individuals sugg...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 255, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...rbivores intake is dependent on plants. This herbivores further become prey for carn...
^^^^
Line 6, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease in supply of plants, in contrast, the risk of carnivores getting endangere...
^^
Line 8, column 54, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
..., it is true that extinction of animals cant be stopped but can be delayed by pourin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42760942761 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76583700229 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3685073739 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312138932082 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10085791253 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117060982318 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189461257466 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120454646571 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.