The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
The bar chart compares the proportion of people who had own place where to live and who rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of people who owned accommodation increased over the period while people who rented accommodation declined at the same period.
In 1918, people who rented accommodation accounted for 77% while the percentage of people who rented accommodation was at 24%. Then for the following 21 years the percentage decreased steadily to about 68% for people who rented accommodation, in contrast, the percentage of households who owned accommodation increased by 10%. From 1939 to 1953 the percentage for both households leveled off, then in 1971 year the percentage who owned and rented accommodation comprised of 50%.
In the period from 1971 to 2001 the percentage of owners increased to rich a high at 69% while people who rented the accommodation dropped dramatically to a low of 31%. For the next decade the percentage decreased to finish the period at about 64% for house owners and raised to 36% for people who rented the accommodation.
- Every culture throughout time has recorded it history in one way or another In what ways can history be passed on to the next generation 61
- People sleep less than before in many countries.Why do people sleep less?What effect does it have on an individually and on society? 56
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 61
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extend do you agree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06951871658 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04938523669 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459893048128 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.7777353365 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312764359601 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187709181469 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963204700835 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225069732114 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109250503604 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.