The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006.
The two bar charts show the proportion of energy consumption from fossil fuels and renewable energy sources in the UK and the USA in 2000 and 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that usage of energy from fossil fuels was higher in two countries in 2000 and in 2006 than the consumption from nuclear power and other renewable energy sources.
In 2000, in the UK and in the USA main sources for energy were oil and gas which accounted for approximately 60% and approximately 78% respectively. The consumption of energy from gas in the UK was at just under 20% while in the USA it was at about 13%. The UK consumed energy from nuclear power and the USA uses this sources for energy two times less. Energy from other renewable sources were less than 10% in both countries.
With regards to 2006, both countries used energy from oil more than in 2000 and it accounted for 30% in the UK and 40% in the USA. The consumption of energy from coal in the UK and the USA was two times less in 2006 than in 2000, while energy usage from gas was two times higher in both countries. The consumption of energy from renewable sources and nuclear power remained approximately at the same level as it was in 2000.
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the 19th century The map below shows the development of the village 48
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfall and temperature for one region of East Africa. 56
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 36
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1994 and 2004. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43888522834 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.359090909091 0.547539520022 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3381478005 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405292023577 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224185571628 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128701471733 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332721388412 0.15604864568 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134720251892 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.