These two charts below illustrates the consumption of energy in the USA and UK over the period of 6 years.
Generally,as it can be seen on the chart, the usage of energy resources considerably grew in both countries. The most dramatic change was in consumption of gas in the UK.
The figure for oil in the USA was remained stable with about 40 percent,whereas in the USA, it was almost 30 percent between 2000 and 2006. In terms of coal,it had exact 30 percent in 2000 in the UK,surprisingly,it declined to 15 percent in 2006. It is evident that,the consumption of coal in the USA had been considerably increased by 35 percent over a few years period.Moreover,the figure for gas showed significant changes from about 20% to 38% in the UK,while in the USA it had a slight rise from 15%to 28%.
Regarding to other renewable resources,both countries increased their usage, but the overall percentage is quite minimal. The least usage of other renewable resources was by the USA (7%),furthemore it reduced to 5%, while the figure for the UK remained stable with almost 10 percent.
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kind of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest? 56
- Some People Believe That Competitive Sports, Both Team and Individual, Have No Place in the School Curriculum. How Far Do You Agree or Disagree? Give Reason for Your Answer and Include Any Relevant Examples from Your Own Knowledge or Experience. 73
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its life cycle.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 83
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to more than technology in homes in the UK. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
... over the period of 6 years. Generally,as it can be seen on the chart, the usage ...
^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
...as remained stable with about 40 percent,whereas in the USA, it was almost 30 percent be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... between 2000 and 2006. In terms of coal,it had exact 30 percent in 2000 in the UK,...
^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , surprisingly
...t had exact 30 percent in 2000 in the UK,surprisingly,it declined to 15 percent in 2006. It i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...o 15 percent in 2006. It is evident that,the consumption of coal in the USA had been...
^^^^
Line 4, column 372, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...d by 35 percent over a few years period.Moreover,the figure for gas showed significant c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...percent over a few years period.Moreover,the figure for gas showed significant chang...
^^^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
... changes from about 20% to 38% in the UK,while in the USA it had a slight rise from 15...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , both
... Regarding to other renewable resources,both countries increased their usage, but th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81720430108 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17381033325 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2183244147 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353313185959 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147938272609 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110195222425 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22035178665 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12574833851 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.