Most kinds of media and news sources tend to present some photos with the news headlines in an effort to make it more conspicuous to their audience. Some people believe that these images express more details than the words do. In my view, I utterly agree with this opinion due to several reasons.
Firstly, pictures contain many details that cut a long story short. In other words, an anchorman can spend much time explaining an event that the spectators did not see, but when the channel shows a picture on the screen, many vague points are going to be clear for everyone due to the much information that a picture could tell. One salient example that emphasizes this idea, when a broadcaster started to say how much devastating a hurricane was, and how much damage it caused to the city, the people start to translate his words into scenes as to imagine the current situation. While a couple of images could summarize all of these words in such few seconds. The more pictures the story included. the more obvious the news will be.
Secondly, words are important to describe the situation, but only in the pursuance of completing the dynamic parts of the story. To clarify, pictures are static which means that they do not illustrate any moving events. As a result of this, some words would be immensely beneficial to illustrate the whole idea and help the audience to understand the full situation. Finally, due to the substantial amounts of false news that are spreading everywhere, pictures are considered to be one of the methods that emphasize news honesty. For instance, people may doubt in most of the news that is broadcasted on the television, but once there are some pictures to support the news, they will start to give it more attention in favor of knowing more.
To sum up, words cannot tell much details as a picture can do. Because images not only are capable of delivering a full idea about the ongoing context, but they are also considered to be strong evidence of the news credibility.
- Some people say that in all levels of education,from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution Discuss both views and give your opinion 83
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on outdoor sports Why is it a positive or negative development 100
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel.Write a letter to the manager of the hotel.Say where you think you left the papers.Explain why they are so importantTell the mana 89
- Some people believe that students should always learn in a group rather than study individually. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es as to imagine the current situation. While a couple of images could summarize all ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
.... The more pictures the story included. the more obvious the news will be. Secon...
^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...g more. To sum up, words cannot tell much details as a picture can do. Because im...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for instance, as a result, in my view, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75428571429 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50859095339 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5619103749 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244950986787 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847756304911 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589547628723 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146132670659 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515078946701 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.