A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. old fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, we live in a judgemental world where personal goods and social status are the first criteria after which criticism comes, and traditional moral values like honour and generosity are being forgotten. To a certain extent I would agree with the statement that, these days, people are appreciated for their goods and status, but I also believe that old values are not consigned to oblivion.
It can be clearly seen that we are living in an era where everyone is in a continuous rush after money and, almost in all cases for a better social status. Without any problem we can call it a materialistic era, because every single individual is now analysed and criticised for his/hers appearance and wealth. As a common example, famous figures are the most appropriate one. There are some of them who are famous for promoting their bodies, luxurious houses and cars, while on the other extremity there are
remarkable people who are well-known for their inappropriate behaviour with impressive heritage inherited from parents.
On the other hand, traditional values such as being respectful, responsible, honesty and integrity are seemed to be abandoned in this current world, but in so many societies they still play an essential role. In most of the companies around the globe there is a constant demand for devoted and respectful people, in most of the cases this is the first principle for employing, on the other side business people are still looking for reliable partnerships. Moreover, the most important part should be accomplished by adults, to educate their kids closely considering these values.
As a conclusion, nowadays, we live in an era without any compunction, where earnings and personal status is over anything else, but we should teach the young generation these principles in order to add an improve to this acquisitive world.
- The ease of international travel and the spread of various kind of mass media all over the world have made it more possible than ever for people to know how other people live in other countries. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages ? 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. old fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- 1. As greater numbers of people move to cities and as cities expand in size, city life loses its appeal.2. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. old fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- 1 As greater numbers of people move to cities and as cities expand in size city life loses its appeal 2 To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ration these principles in order to add an improve to this acquisitive world.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, such as, in all cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11881188119 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79639828538 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9329430119 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.1 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126177452005 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497700927882 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409462089514 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661479184841 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434078961425 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.