The three-bar chart shows a compare a percentage of the four faculties at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010 (Law, Computer science, Medicine, and Business Faculty).
Overall, that is a computer science faculty more hight between another faculty except in 1999, the percentages of computer science faculty in every year always increase at 30%, 40%, and 45%. in 1990 computer science as same as a percentage as business faculty at 30%.
According to pie chart showed a low faculty always in the lowest percentage in every year between 10% and 15 %, and for medicine faculty always stabilize percentage in 1990 at 25 % in 2000 at 30 % and in 2010 at 25 %.
In the last description is business faculty, The 3 bar chart showed a decrease of percentage in every year starting at 30 % in 1990, 2000 at 20 %, and the last in 2010 at 15 %.
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. 56
- The chart below shows information about subway systems in three major European cities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main information and making comparisons. 61
- Task2:Today more people are travelling than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...r always increase at 30%, 40%, and 45%. in 1990 computer science as same as a perc...
^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and the last in 2010 at 15 %.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80536912752 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65613675456 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489932885906 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4396531779 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.2 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302610460945 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208275791749 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117526770109 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241774941018 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10652614549 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.