The three-bar chart shows a compare a percentage of the four faculties at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010 (Law, Computer science, Medicine, and Business Faculty).
Overall, that is a computer science faculty more hight between another faculty except in 1999, the percentages of computer science faculty in every year always increase at 30%, 40%, and 45%. in 1990 computer science as same as a percentage as business faculty at 30%.
According to pie chart showed a low faculty always in the lowest percentage in every year between 10% and 15 %, and for medicine faculty always stabilize percentage in 1990 at 25 % in 2000 at 30 % and in 2010 at 25 %.
In the last description is business faculty, The 3 bar chart showed a decrease of percentage in every year starting at 30 % in 1990, 2000 at 20 %, and the last in 2010 at 15 %.
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Task2:Today more people are travelling than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 56
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows information about subway systems in three major European cities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main information and making comparisons. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...r always increase at 30%, 40%, and 45%. in 1990 computer science as same as a perc...
^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and the last in 2010 at 15 %.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80536912752 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65613675456 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489932885906 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4396531779 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.2 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302610460945 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208275791749 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117526770109 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241774941018 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10652614549 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.