The table shows a subway system in London, Paris, and Moscow. The data compare a total length, number of stations, and number of daily passengers.
Overall, London has a more total track length than a Paris and Moscow at 408 Km, and lower a Total track length is Paris at 214 Km but for a number of daily passengers Paris more than a London at 4.5 million.
Other, Moscow has number passengers more than all at 6.5 million, and total track length at 300 km and a number of station in operation at 182, compare as London on a number of daily at 3 million more less than Moscow and Paris, but for the number of station London has 275 operations that are a middle between the other.
In conclusion, a subway system for Total track length is London, and a number of station in operation is Paris, and Number of daily passengers is Moscow.
- The chart below shows information about subway systems in three major European cities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main information and making comparisons. 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. 56
- Task2:Today more people are travelling than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a number of station in operation at 182, compare as London on a number of daily a...
^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns that are a middle between the other. In conclusion, a subway system for Tota...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e between the other. In conclusion, a subway system for Total track length i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 691.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45806451613 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33630354534 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 62.0 106.607317073 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.8006396567 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.2 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0259177559785 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366803341101 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520635718886 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0317866318743 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033184825934 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.18 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.