Are robots more intelligent than humans? Give reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Many people fear that as our technology advances, robots will one day take over the world. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely say that robots are not more intelligent than humans. It is my firm belief that robots are not smarter than humans for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, people have instincts and intuitions that cannot be programmed into robots. Ultimately, robots are machines created by humans. As sophisticated as they may be, they will always lack human element. One obvious example of this is with piloting aircrafts. Robots have been developed with flying capabilities so that a pilot is not needed in the airplane. However, human pilots are still used over robots because the studies have shown that pilots have flight instincts that cannot be reproduced in robots. You see, when a plane is quickly losing altitude, a robot must rely on the measurements inside the plane, while a human pilot can also analyze weather conditions, discuss the situation with a co-pilot, and use his previous experience to make a decision. For this reason, because robots lack the ability to use their sixth sense to make informed decisions, they will never be more intelligent than humans.
Secondly, robots lack emotional intelligence. Some underestimate the importance of human intelligence we get from our emotions. In this ever- interconnected world we live in, it is extremely important to have the ability to read other’s emotions easily and control your own emotions as well. For example, a person with good emotional intelligence would be more successful negotiating a business transaction. My friend john, for example, is the top salesman at the pharmaceutical company he works at. He credits his success to his ability to read other party’s feelings about the deal while not revealing too much of his own feelings in order to get their way. It is unimaginable that robots could exercise the same level of emotional intelligence that my friend john would in this situation. Therefore, because robots could not use emotional intelligence, they are not smarter than humans.
In light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that robots are not smarter than humans because they lack instincts and intuitions and also emotional intelligence.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 85
- Reading notes Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these onlin 81
- Most people credit Columbus with the "discovery" of America. However, recent evidence suggests that Columbus didn't really discover America, but merely opened the doors to America for Europe. Today, researchers agree that the Vikings actual 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity to read other's emotions easily and control your own emotions as well. F...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15748031496 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87668831502 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527559055118 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1352919609 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241672356296 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07789290186 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573406673367 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156221697015 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363676326744 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.