Government should focus spending only on public services, not waste on the arts. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Community services are supposed to be the only priority of the authority, not spending their budget for another aspect, for instance the arts. In accordance with this issue, this essay will explain further information about my perspective in favour of supporting the development of all aspects of a country, including public services and the arts.
In regard to my point of view, I do appreciate to statements which believed that the bureaucrat is supposed to focus solely on public services. First and foremost, I do personally agree to the statement of developing public services, nevertheless, second but not less crucial, we additionally have to monitor and control other sectors, such as the arts. I do believe that this sector also has its own role, particularly, in order to make a specific identity of a nation.
Regarding to the argument above, these days, we already knew that a majority of people across the globe are extremely fascinated about the arts. They, moreover, used to go to faraway places in order to know and experience new cultures, arts, and tourism about some states and because of this reason, the ruler, in addition, need to keep maintaining other aspects of their country because it is also able to render numerous benefits to their economy sector.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that developing public services of a nation is one of the terrific things to do, nonetheless, its government additionally has to monitor their other sectors. Thus, in order to make some countries bestowing more advantages and less disadvantage, the authority of its nation should maintain and control every component that they had.
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- Bar Chart : The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 84
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. Why are these changes happening? Do you think these changes are positive and negative? 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 84
- Process : How Biogas is produced. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09191176471 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85068275908 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7718049482 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.888888889 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2222222222 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.8888888889 7.06120827912 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190989604767 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767754754268 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512904003875 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105401405541 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584672400187 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.