Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: in twenty years there will be fewer cars on the road than there are today.
Mobility plays an important role in today's world. It is prerequisite for all economic activities and the success of any nation depends on how frequently the citizens of that country move. There are various modes of transportation like road, air, rail etc. People's preference has significant influence on number of cars on road. Some people argue that there will be more car on the road in future. While some opposes that statement. I believe that the number of cars on the road will decline in next twenty years for two main reasons, which I will elaborate in the following essay.
The main reason is that the rise of environmental concerns among people, which will influence the government of many countries to impose restrictions on licensing of cars. Nowadays the world community is concern about green house gas emission, which is responsible for increase of world's temperature. International organizations will create pressures on the government of respective country to levy more taxes on car. This will discourage the people from buying car for personal use and as a consequence people will choose to travel at public transport. For example, few years back in my country, the number of personal cars on the road multiplied by few numbers. Then the government imposed additional forty percent tax on buying cars, which reduced number of cars sale. Moreover, people started to travel by public transport rather than using their personal cars. All these factors responsible for limiting the traffic jam in my country.
The another reason is that the increase of price of fuel for car. We all know that our reserve for mineral resources are limited and if we continue to use this resources abundantly, then at certain point the resources will finish one day . Therefore, to decrease the use of natural resources, the government increase the price of oil, which reduces number of cars on the road. For instance, few years back the government of India observed that trend of using personal cars was raising continuously. Then the authority decided to increase the oil price by five Rupee per liter. ultimately, the government's decision of raising the oil price proved fruitful as people started to move by metro rail or by public buses. This proves that increase of oil price limits the number of cars on the road.
In conclusion, I agree that in next twenty years, the numbers of cars on the road will decline. I believe so because the people will be more concern about conserving environment and natural resources, which will motivate the government to impose new regulations on using personal cars. The price of oil price will go up than today. All these factors will reduce the number of cars on road. I appreciate the government's promote actions for preserving our environment and natural resources.
- R.robustus was the active hunter of dinosaur 65
- Many of the world's lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them. The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct. 50
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year , fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year.And yet the percentage of positive reviews about specific Super Screen movies have increased in th 29
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher Others think that it is always better to have a teacher Which do you prefer Use specific reasons to support your choice 82
- Painting of Rembrandt 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...that there will be more car on the road in future. While some opposes that statement. I b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...will be more car on the road in future. While some opposes that statement. I believe ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s are limited and if we continue to use this resources abundantly, then at certain p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... point the resources will finish one day . Therefore, to decrease the use of natur...
^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Rupee' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'rupees'.
Suggestion: Rupees
...cided to increase the oil price by five Rupee per liter. ultimately, the governments ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ultimately
... the oil price by five Rupee per liter. ultimately, the governments decision of raising th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... our environment and natural resources.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2343.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01713062099 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7194089436 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475374732334 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8819774084 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7777777778 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2962962963 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03703703704 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232260953662 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754009881574 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704318008647 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172977078013 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793386757616 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.