People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there are lots of old buildings which seem risky and prone to collapse. In my opinion, despite some uniqueness of those buildings, some of them should be deconstructed and replace with the new ones.
There are two main reasons to support modern buildings. Firstly, dilapidated buildings are precarious. They are likely to collapse and put pedestrians in danger. For instance, when I was a child, some parts of an old building in my hometown had fallen down and made two pedestrians injured. Secondly, most architecture from the past is in bad shape with obsolete facilities and old-fashion designs. Therefore, they require considerable amount of money for renovation and repairing.
On the other hand, some old buildings should be preserved. First of all, historical buildings represent significance of culture and traditions which makes people living nearby them feel proud. Secondly, with their remarkable styles, these building boost the economy of nation by attracting tourists' attention. The more travellers visit, the more money is spent. For example, in Thailand, the grand palace and the temple of emerald Buddha is the most famous. Because of their splendid structures and original Thai motifs, millions of people choose to visit them every year. Apart from that, some historical sites have educational benefits. Because of their uniqueness, they are worth studying in several ways such as architecture, aesthetics and history.
In conclusion, due to value of the old buildings, they should be partly conserved. However, inessential old ones should be reconstructed with the modern ones because of safety and urban development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-24 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | Nguyễn Tấn Anh | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | xinyu961121 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | xinyu961121 | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-19 | armiez | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home As a result employees will have much more flexible working hours in the future Is this a positive or negative development 84
- as a result of electronic inventions such as the computer and television, people do less physical activity, and this is having a negative effect on their health.to what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good. While other believe this is a problem for s country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46875 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90906281891 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7885007907 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.7777777778 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2222222222 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222461676289 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645719231363 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060736886324 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14049097798 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379234173872 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.