The table represents British income distribution to various popular components in 1998, divided by gender and age.
Overall, music occupied the largest proportion of children’ earnings whereas food was the biggest adults’ spendings.
Accounting for 39%, music was the largest components of children expenditure, in which the proportion between boys and girls were nearly the same (at 38% and 40% respectively). A similar divergence was seen in videos and food, which comprised 12% and 10% correspondingly. Despite the second largest proportion, electronic equipment witnessed the most enormous divergence among boys and girls, with 18% and 5%.
Conversely, mature people spent more on food than other items. 25% of their budget went on food, exactly four times higher than the spendings on electronic equipment and music while videos constituted merely 1%. Interestingly, except for the music in which men and women represented an equal percentage of music spendings, food followed a reversed pattern with others. It was observed that the proportion of female spendings on food tripled male ones. By contrast, men surpassed women, by exactly four times in the case of videos and ten-fold in circumstance of electronic equipment.
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001. 84
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from 3 age groups worked 84
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998. 78
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 74
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, second, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04385055071 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.021810974 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0796880958786 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349706708995 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477474111879 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639414276196 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561044903114 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.