Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Railways are better for transportation at the moment, especially free from traffic congestion. The authorities ought to utilize the amount on the trains rather than road transportation. it seems to me that a better way to utilize the railways in many aspects and I will explain what benefits of this in the essay.
Firstly, the juncture of the railroads is favoured than road vehicles, in which the point of fuel economy, emissions, traffic congestion. Everything is interlinked with each other. Trains are may quiet all concerns of the stem. This diminishes the traffic by which all folks are travelled in trains and beneficial to authorities economy Although the fuel saved by road vehicles as well emissions reduce. This is the main reason to ought to spend the money on trains by governments. For instance, In India, one of state Telangana had built the metro trains, because of the huge tailback in Hyderabad city.
It might be said that roadways are everywhere in the world with the connection of each village to town to city. However, trains would not be in all locations.
To conclude, it seems to me that better exert of railways to lead superior development, further advancement taken by the governments as location-based areas.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- some people believe that it's not necessary to have internet access to live a family life. What is your opinion,give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 56
- some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled they say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.to what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 73
- the pie chart below shows where energy is used in typed Australian household and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in meadowside village and fonton a neighbouring town since 1962 68
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Railways are better for transportation a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...trains rather than road transportation. it seems to me that a better way to utiliz...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in what benefits of this in the essay. Firstly, the juncture of the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the huge tailback in Hyderabad city. It might be said that roadways ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trains would not be in all locations. To conclude, it seems to me that better ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, may, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 206.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04854368932 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92295900081 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577669902913 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 506.74238477 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2196636652 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144508553702 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494239493535 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433829685666 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761823447488 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365955768696 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.