The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by Lincoln on Tue, 05/07/2019 - 07:33

The pie charts illustrate the units of electricity production by coal, oil, natural gas, hydropower and nuclear power in Australia and France for the past 20 years.

Overall, at the beginning of the period coal was the largest units of electricity production made by fuel in Australia. While in France it was natural gas and coal. In comparison, at the end of the period the least units of electricity production in Australia was natural gas and oil. While in France it was natural gas and hydropower.

In 1980, coal electricity production increased more than doubled in 2000 from 50 units to 130 units fuel source in Australia. There was also a significant change had seen in hydropower which was rose for about 16 units of fuel electricity production for the past 20 years. While both natural gas and oil dropped to 2 units of electricity made by fuel in 2000, respectively.

In France, at the end of the period both natural gas and hydropower decreased to 2 units of electricity production in 2000, respectively. While nuclear power peaked from 15 units in 1980 to 126 units over the past 20 years. Oil increased to 5 units from 1980 and coal remained to 25 units of electricity production made by fuel.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2019-11-16 kalampeet 73 view
2019-11-16 kalampeet 56 view
2019-11-16 kalampeet 56 view
2019-11-14 junjunh 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Lincoln :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...icity production in 2000, respectively. While nuclear power peaked from 15 units in 1...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79047619048 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83604911861 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.390476190476 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6991561814 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4545454545 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278221925569 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142770104005 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696672030689 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208015729862 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031857529426 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.23 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.