Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often argued that developing trains and tram are better than wasting money on the roads. I do not agree with this statement, and I believe that the benefits of developing roads are much higher.
Firstly, the potential for spending money on roads is huge and effective. we can see that the circumstance of traffic management is weak. In busy hours, the resident cannot arrive at their destination at a precise time since there are many vehicles on duty and the capacity of roads are overloaded. there are lot of feasible ways to improve the situation. we may recommend that, for instance, the government should spend expenditure on road management, which restricts the driver of a private car that cannot drives on a busy time according to their vehicle license. The method is referred to the policy of Beijing, and the result of them are very successful, improve the crowded environment of roads smoothly. Therefore, the feasibility of spending money on roads is high.
Secondly, the result of spending money on roads may affect air pollution. Nowadays, vehicle pollution is high for the proportion of air pollution, as the sources of vehicle energy come from fossil fuel, which may damage our environment easily. So, the government invests on the roads, which represent vehicles, may change the bad circumstance. For example, motivate electricity car, instead of classical vehicles by fossil fuel, could reduce the air pollution effectively. according to the above assuming, we may understand that the effect of improving the roads is better than investing in railways, as far as the government has to spend money.
To sum up, as investing expenditure on roads is feasible as well as improve the environment, I believe that development of roads is the best choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- The graph below shows the quantiies of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...g money on roads is huge and effective. we can see that the circumstance of traffi...
^^
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...d the capacity of roads are overloaded. there are lot of feasible ways to improve the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...feasible ways to improve the situation. we may recommend that, for instance, the g...
^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...d reduce the air pollution effectively. according to the above assuming, we may understan...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06484641638 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84682149007 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5767705574 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158760821697 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614745408272 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659192943776 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106142259474 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894861488545 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.