Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students the danger of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
This is a fact that a lot of people become good citizens after taking prison time. In my opinion, they will be the most suitable individuals to talk with students the danger of committing a crime.
First, former prisoners are the best example to show students what should not do and the consequences of violate laws. Students could aware of dangers of crimes through the eyes of persons who committed them, so that students can know how to prevent such things happening to their life in a manifested way. For examples, some people stole things due to poverty can give superior advises for students that they should not have same mistakes when undergoing bad situations. And breaking laws leads to profoundly devastating effects on a person ‘s life such as hardly find good occupations, broken relationships, bad reputation, and difficult to join community.
Second, young students tend to trust people with real experiences than a teacher just tells monotonous theories. That is the reason that offenders who become better persons will be the best suitable instructors to impart students how dangerous crimes can be. Furthermore, lesson learns from person who executed always trustful and imageable for young students to completely and deeply understand. Students would fell more interesting and concentrate on conversation with former prisoners than anyone else. Additionally, students also learn the processes of overcoming tough situations to become a good person. And that stories emotionalize students and encourage them to try to overcome difficult situations instead of violating rules.
In conclusion, conversations with individuals who are good citizen after leaving prisons are an eminent method to educate students about dangers of becoming criminals and preventing same mistakes in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-21 | Kuldeep Kumar | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-10 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | amelieee | 67 | view |
- ducation for young people is important in many countries. However, the others thinkgovernment should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read andwrite. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wildanimals and that this could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do youagree or disagree. 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types ofeducational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant 73
- Nowadays people always throw old things away, what causes this problem? What effects does the phenomenon lead to? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- Map 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'executed'.
Suggestion: always executed
...thermore, lesson learns from person who executed always trustful and imageable for young studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43971631206 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8733821769 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613475177305 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4688825529 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314073466204 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105863556155 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580732962958 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200904891393 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571666419268 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.