The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia. The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015.
Give are two figures concerning monthly cost for three kinds of restaurant and visitors of them per year from 1965 to 2015 in Australia. The first categorized as restaurant expenditure per month and its type (Indian, Italian and Chinese) as to their income, whilst the second one indicates the number of restaurant visitors per year.
Regarding to monthly expenditure, the bar chart are classified to three subdivisions (low, medium and high income). In low-income restaurants, Italian and Indian have the lowest and highest monthly cost, respectively. A glance at the graph provided manifests that in <span style="font-size: 24.2px;">medium-income </span>subdivision, minimum and maximum monthly expenditure belongs to Italian and Chinese restaurants, respectively. As for high income, Indian restaurants have the lowest expenditure and Chinese ones have the most expenditure per month.
Turning to number of visitors per year, it is apparent from the information supplied that each of three restaurants (Indian, Chinese and Italian) over the year from 1965 to 2015 had a sinuous curve. As a result of which, the number of visitors grew. At commencing years from 1965 to 1975, the number of visitors Chinese restaurants were more than others, in the subsequent years to 1990, more number belonged to Italian, and in the following years to 2015, again Chinese gained more the number.
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 84
- The charts give information about the amount of exports millions of tonnes moving through Rotterdam port in Holland to various global destinations in 2002 and 2012 and also the rates of tax imposed on these exports by the receiving countries 92
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not e ective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 84
- In modern times, young adult are spending less time with their families and more time with their friends. Why has this change occurred? Do you think parents should force their children to spend more time at home? 84
- In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, as for, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49302325581 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48494094823 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506976744186 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5548419938 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.222222222 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232712307283 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107214642934 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636347688485 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172625507153 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656807331393 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.