More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern life style which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is universally acknowledge that; today’s fast paced life-style is adversely effecting individuals health and diseases are resistant to the latest medical practice. Although, it is thought by many that we must get back to old herbal remedies. This essay will deeply analyze why solution of modern ailments is entirely necessary with old methods.
Firstly, many advocate that new diseases are associated with sedentary life-style. Many modern medicines are not effective and could be solely resolved by altering daily-routine rather than adding ancient herbal remedies. People remains confine to their daily chores and unable to spare time for physical activities in order to remain healthy. A succinate example proclaiming this; obesity is one of the most contentious concern encountered with sedentary life-style, to get rid of excess body fat rigorous activities are more effective solution to reverse this. If normal healthy routine including healthy diet and exercise is adopted, then these health problems can be resolved, but I presume that this does not suffice the whole cause.
One the other hand, effectiveness of modern cure for today’s ailments is debatable and opting traditional herbal remedies are completely imperative. As these practices are testified and run from generations to generations, there is no denying in their efficacy, leaving negligible side effects to the body and effective for any age-group. For instance, In USA, medical professionals are prescribing traditional medicines to most of their patients suffering from weight gain due to tiring and tedious life-style with no room for exercise, and the results were quite effective when compared with solutions available these days. Overall, with modern practices only life style modifications are not enough to extirpate these problems and old harmless therapy is also necessary.
To conclude, health issues are arising with desk-bound routine and not relieving with modern drugs or routine changes. I completely agree that we should bring back old traditional drug therapy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | Thaonguyen1409 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that the only purpose of a zoo is entertainment.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Success is often measured by wealth and material belongings.Do you think wealth is the best measure of success?What makes a successful person ? 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 61
- Nowadays, many teachers use technology in class. Is this a positive or negative development. 73
- Some people believe that companies should hire only male staff.Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
It is universally acknowledge that; today's fast paced life-styl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sistant to the latest medical practice. Although, it is thought by many that we must get...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advocates'.
Suggestion: many advocates
...necessary with old methods. Firstly, many advocate that new diseases are associated with s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64217252396 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90052212732 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623003194888 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.068567781 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222395753358 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717091659011 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346136682489 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126854201013 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321412364778 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.