More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern life style which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicines should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree?
Numerous individuals suffered with the modern way of living and the advance prescriptions are not enough to take care. It has argued by a significant number of individuals that re introduction of the traditional medicines must be promoted. In my opinion, I disagree because traditional pills are slow in treatment as compared with chemical tablets, however, modern medicines are more reliable and some precautions can save the people from suffering.
On the one hand, in today’s lifestyle the stress related to work and pollution from traffic is very common in the society, which force an individual to take these chemical pills to recover faster from stress and unhygienic air. But in sometimes the human body is getting resistant to such medicines after taking them again and again. Consequently, failure of modern pills to cure the infection. Hence, control in intake and proper prescribed medicines from doctors can save people from getting resistant to infections of modern life style.
On the other hand, traditional medicines are naturally made and their action towards infection is always on broader scale. These pills are slow in response against infections and the repair methods are poor against diseases. Traditional medicines are not specific against health problems. For example, medicine for headache and body pain is common, therefore treating the individual with both the pains may take more time while treating with such medicines.
In conclusion, although there are drawbacks of advance medicines, certain precautions can eliminate such negatives. But using homemade remedies can take longer time to recover patients, thus I believe that we should not encourage traditional medicines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | Thaonguyen1409 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
- You have seen an advertisement for a community college that needs teachers for night classes.Write a letter to the community college. In your letter:say which advertisement you are answeringdescribe which course(s) you want to teach, and what it/they woul 73
- Some employers of er their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs,believing that this will make their staf healthier and thus more ef ective at work. Other employerssee no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects of t 100
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- People should work a fixed number of hours per week, and employers should not ask anybody to work more than this. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. 56
- You have recently used a moving company to move your household items to a new place and they have been damaged in transfer. Write a letter to the company’s manager and say– When and where did it take place?– What is your complaint?– Suggest a reas 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49242424242 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83352575914 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587121212121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8043349276 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.538461538 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277118620489 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885025642487 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643204696033 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15246551161 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716962016744 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.