Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
One of the major problem that people are afflict with is nothing but health-related issues. According to some people, public health can be enhanced just by government through enacting as to nutritive and healthy food. Whilst, some other people are of the opinion that direct responsible of these issues are own people. There are arguments on both side, however, which we will discuss succinctly here.
To begin with, it might be said that if government pays more attention to people’s foods, in respect of wholesomeness or unwholesomeness, public health will be ameliorated, leading to exuberant and dynamic society. Furthermore, by declining the rate of malady among people, government could dedicate the running costs which belongs to the area of social health to other section, for instance construction or transport network. Finally, not only could government increase level of public health by passing law, but also it might be utilitarian in the light of decreasing government’s expenditures .
Conversely, some believe the onus should be taken from government and people shoulder it. They always justify that people themselves need to take the responsibility of every deeds, one of which is public health. They opine people could provide health for themselves by themselves. Opting between healthy and unhealthy foodstuff should be leaved to people. Moreover, for eschewing from major physical problem and sedentary lifestyle, some had better sign up for gym as well as participation in competitive event. On top of that, people are not supposed to indulge in poor diet of convenience food, in which case they are prone to diversity diseases. Therefore, people could take some steps in the healthy way.
To sum up, regime has a major effect on social health by imposing some laws to health illness, albeit people have some burdens towards to their health by attending more on selecting proper lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Susan Wangui | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | KhaledAkbari | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | KhaledAkbari | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | erfan.mohamadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | Dodger | 73 | view |
- The charts show Chart a the average speed of urban zone traffic in kilometers per hour or kph in a number of countries over a fifty year period including a future estimate and also Chart b the total number of urban zones per country in thousands 100
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 84
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 89
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 78
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ecreasing government's expenditures . Conversely, some believe the onus s...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asing government's expenditures . Conversely, some believe the onus should...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35855263158 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93347543897 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9048702489 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288637260601 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099698066204 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539221142542 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189482346582 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391398268361 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.