It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life, especially for families. What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside, for example as farmers? What is your own view about this?
Needless to say that from the standpoint of the quality of life, pastoral districts are more apt in comparison to cosmopolitans. There exist some debates about living and working in these areas and being self-sufficient. In the following, it will be discussed about the credence of pros and cons succinctly.
On the one side, those who are the proponents of living in this area put forward that people can go through a healthier life. First and foremost, by living in far-flung areas, rural persons have higher access to fresh commodities, intuitively giving rise to being more wholesome and puissant. For example, having fruits that are not pesticide will cause that users keep their health status quo. Moreover, veering away from air and sound pollution and making time more tranquilized in rural areas will lead to strong mental wholesome. For example, farmers having crop and animal husbandry can acquire fresh milk and fruits, e.g., citrus, so that if they lived in urban, they would not have otherwise had.
On the other hand, those who are the opponents of the former notion maintain that should a person live in a village, they will irrefutably deprive themselves of modern technologies, such as the internet, higher education, and state-of-the-art hospitals. Furthermore, those persons would not be able to establish a successful connection with other peoples thanks to living in a secluded place and bereft of environmental awareness and communication with each stratum of people. To the best of the author's knowledge, sometimes countryside people have difficulty in the colloquy with urban persons.
To briefly recapitulate, I go for the first idea, believing that living in the countryside and working in forestry outweigh being in cosmopolitans. Nonetheless, rural areas instigate each person to live there due to its high quality of life, e.g., lack of pollution and access to fresh materials, cities offer the new technologies, broadening knowledge, and high sanitary and hygiene systems.
- The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015 100
- The bar chart shows the expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 di erent areas 57
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 78
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...h stratum of people. To the best of the authors knowledge, sometimes countryside people...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, e.g., first, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31661442006 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96122947824 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576802507837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6361840243 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170334305897 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601432863335 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460454003412 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1062964942 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531610151312 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.