The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university.
The manifested plans evince two distinguished student rooms on the sinistral side of the snapshot (one for two people and another for one student) located at a university in Australia, along with a legend on the dextral side of the figure.
With respect to the upper plan, indicating the studio is 24 square meters belonging to two people, as can be seen, the rental cost is $350 per week. Moreover, except for two single beds, there are two study desks and one bathroom in the top left corner. Furthermore, in the lower-left are there a microwave, a stove, and a sink.
Turning to the lower plan, demonstrating the studio is 15 square meters for a solitary person, one can find that apart from a single bed as well as a study desk, there exist some facilities, e.g., a sink, a microwave, and a stove in the lower-left corner of the aforementioned student room. On top of them, the rental cost of this room is $200 for each week.
Overall, it can be seen that the student room for one person is destitute of a table, chairs, and a bookshelf. And notwithstanding the square of the lower room is ca three-fifths of the upper one, its cost is about four-sevenths of the upper one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, except for, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55399061033 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76736570496 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1087671939 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422510532539 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180478654274 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138284541725 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277640428568 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120543465703 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.