The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.
The figure elucidates the number of British emigration to several nations from 2004 to 2007. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the amount of British emigration to Australia.
To begin with, there were gradual palpitations for the total of British emigration to Australia and USA between 2004, which made up at just above 40 for Australia and well beneath 30 for USA, and 2007, which constituted roughly at 52 and 20 respectively. 2004 to 2007 witnessed a slight drop in the total of British emigration to New Zealand where it, initially, stood at well under 30 and terminated to 20 by the end of the period shown.
In accordance with other aspects, the amount of British emigration to Spain upright positioned roughly at 34 and it peaked to 35 in next year, nevertheless, it plunged significantly to well across 20 in the following 2 years. Following the similar pattern as Spain, the British emigration to France experienced an enormous oscillation from 2004, which was at just beyond 20, through to 2007, which accounted for just less than 20.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | Trần Hồng Khiếm | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Cherry06 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | Mishika sugandhi | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | Komalsandhu | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | alifdores | 84 | view |
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. Why are these changes happening? Do you think these changes are positive and negative? 11
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Bar Chart : The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 84
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them. 73
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91891891892 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83047177859 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589189189189 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3897646347 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246776547515 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148786337443 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618634525949 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192624336241 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429285072286 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.