Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently
In this modern world, what we understand as a political leader is a representative of the people who always remain active to serve the nation. In democratic states, people select the leaders and leaders always try to satiate the demand of people. That’s why, there are two groups of people, one of them believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. Here, I mostly agree with the second group that a leader should be committed to principles and objectives.
First of all, people always want a leader who is an honest, sensitive and good human being. If the character of the leader is not good people will not trust him and vote him to elect as a leader. For example in 2007 election of Bangladesh, BNP, the ruling party was defeated very badly because most of the leaders were corrupted highly. They managed to get only 30 seats within 300 seats though they were one of the most popular political party of Bangladesh. That means people want a leader who always maintains his principles.
Secondly, in most of the country people are divided according to their demands. For example, young people of the state want the job security, more industries, again another portion of the society will oppose the idea saying that more industries will be detrimental to environment. Again, there are also discriminatory factors such as racism, minority issue based on religion. In that case, if a leader want to satiate the one major portion the population, other portion will be deprived. That’s why the leader should be neutral and he should work for the whole nation without any discrimination based on religion, power. For example, in 2000 the hindu’s were about the 8 percent of the total population. But, after 5 years of tyranny on hindu people, they became only 2 percent of total population. It is because leaders helped local muslims to snatch hindu’s land and property. By doing so, leaders tried to please the muslims, because they were the biggest portion of the population. This phenomenon indicates the necessity of leaders who will remain neutral for all and always maintain his ethics.
Finally, sometimes leaders need to go against the public opinion for the noble cause. Public are not always right and concerned about their immediate demands. That’s why true leaders need to show them the right path for the betterment of the country. For example, Abraham Lincoln fought against major portion of the American to eliminate slavery. At first, people opposed him and Abraham Lincoln didn’t leave the mission. Finally, people understood that Lincoln was right. In that way, gradually he became successful to eliminate slavery from America.
In summary, from the above analysis and examples it is clear that political leaders must be committed to principles. Without being committed to principles, a leader can’t serve the nation in a fair way.
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 58
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 66
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 83
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...st of the leaders were corrupted highly.They managed to get only 30 seats within 300...
^^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'factors'?
Suggestion: factors
...t. Again, there are also discriminatory factor such as racism, minority issue based on...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1000, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... the biggest portion of the population. This phenomena indicates the necessity of le...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1015, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'indicate'.
Suggestion: indicate
...rtion of the population. This phenomena indicates the necessity of leaders who will remai...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 193, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fair way" with adverb for "fair"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s, a leader can't serve the nation in a fair way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in summary, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2612.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1015625 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70797241936 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490234375 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2520032984 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53571428571 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410217365872 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105656900712 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112241482245 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232600884606 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172576331667 0.0667264976115 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.