Certain kinds of music promote young children learning, agree or disagree.
While, in all likelihood, such topics will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on whether certain kinds of music can promote learning in the life of children or not can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is that music can have a positive impact on children's lives, and encourages certain types of learning. I will discuss both sides in detail on the following positions and thus, lead to a plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there is a myriad of reasons in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that the music is inextricably bound to children's lives as they start their early life by listening to rhythmic rhymes. This promotes a positive impact on the learning abilities of their early childhood. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that the significance of music plays a stepping stone in young children's learning.
On the flip side, many people claim that children exposed to music at an early age can deviate their academic focus by spending their time almost on music albums. However, some people still believe that the right choice of music can help develop their children's academic learning. This illustrates how certain types of music can foster young children's learning.
In conclusion, I can see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have put forward, and I am inclined to believe that the right choice of music can help in the learning of young children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | ashkan rafiee | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | priyankavs23 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | priyankavs23 | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Dangar sandip M. | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | shreyanshpte | 86 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09128630705 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89912353492 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53112033195 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9086038938 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.545454545 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340838894288 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139457185605 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100346795551 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204783768598 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054856714737 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.