The given table illustrates how much free time all the ages of populations in Someland spend on five entertainment activities a year.
Overall, it is clear that the population in Someland fall into three distinct age groups, which are arranged to follow the gradual decrease of free-time: teenager, the old( aged 70 or over) and the working people(20-60-years-old). Furthermore, the best favorite activity is watching TV/ Videos in all the ages.
Looking at the king of spending on time, the teenager and eldest people take 1200 and 1100 hours, respectively. While this figure for the middle age is a half that above, which its average stand at just under 600 hours. The cinema is the least choice, 100 hours of youngest ages and spending 17 hours on the old, went down by 25 hours step by step from 20 to 50 ages with an exception in 60-years-old at 50 hours.
In other almost activities have more times in the young age group than the old. A difference is in Socializing with 4 or under operation, the children seem to be not interested in that, only 150 hours and approximately 200-hour spending on higher age groups.
- some cities are growing large, what are the reasons and consequences 56
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 84
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 51
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 84
- The pie chart shows information about water resources, and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Canada. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given table illustrates how much fre...
^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the youngest'.
Suggestion: of the youngest
...e cinema is the least choice, 100 hours of youngest ages and spending 17 hours on the old, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7641025641 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9298796236 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2902281141 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175688692538 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074013428592 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473934636443 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112636068565 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385469458926 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.