The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years
The line graph illustrates productions of waste performed by 3 companies throughout 15 years.
Overall, company A and B’s waste outputs were similar in terms of the downward trend, while that of company C has the opposite pattern/while the opposite pattern could be observed in Company C’s.
In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste, which was the highest amount in comparison with 9 tonnes of company B and 4 tonnes of company C. From 2000 to 2005, there were increases in waste outputs of company B and C, reaching to 11 and 6 tonnes respectively, whereas, that of company A declined gradually by over 2 tonnes.
From 2005 onwards, company C created more waste with the production rising significantly to over 6 tonnes. in contrast, the outputs of company B and A reduced by the equivalent figure of 2 tonnes. In 2015, company C’s waste amount was over 10 tonnes, surpassing company A and B’s outputs, which saw considerable declines to 8 and 3 tonnes respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- the chart below show the percentage of water use by different sector in Australia and Sydney in 1997 and 2002007 78
- Each year, the crime rate increases. What are the causes of crime and What could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity? 78
- overpopulation in major urban center around the world is major problem, What are the causes of this? How can problem be solved. 73
- the chart below shows the annual pay for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of company B and 4 tonnes of company C. From 2000 to 2005, there were increases ...
^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... rising significantly to over 6 tonnes. in contrast, the outputs of company B and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99404761905 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00126933653 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4158230006 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278567840799 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146874082258 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492585943704 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184715263958 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445221465869 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.