The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006
The line graph provides a variety of information relating to how the European price of 800 grams per four different ranges of bread had changed during five years in a particular country in Europe.
It is obvious that whereas the price of brown, white and rye bread had increased in a whole period, there was a wide fluctuation in a wholegrain type. Especially, it was such the most significant growth that the price of brown bread took accounted for.
Looking in the chart for more details, in 2001, while citizens cost 0,8 euros for 800 grams of wholegrain bread, the amount of money paid for three other types was lower, being 0,6 euros. However, in the next year, not only wholegrain but also brown bread had soared dramatically and peaked at 1,8 and 1,5 euros per 800 grams respectively.
After two continuous years, in 2004, the price of wholegrain bread that city dwellers spent saw an incredible diminishing, being nearly twice times as less as in 2002. In addition, apart from the slight increasing in costs of white and rye bread, another was believed to be the most expensive in that country. Until 2005, the proportion of price that citizens consumed for brown and wholegrain bread was two to one. Moreover, rye bread was more inexpensive than white range, being 0,7 euros and 1,3 euros in turn.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- The given diagram indicates information about how used glass bottles are recycled. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...shing, being nearly twice times as less as in 2002. In addition, apart from the sl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79735682819 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51793620192 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859030837 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5685934675 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296904186225 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120053229327 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051089695707 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177066844575 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450737717616 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.