Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.
Do you agree or disagree?
These days, endangered species are among the most alarming issues encountered by many nations, which has raised certain questions on whether the conservation is necessary. I, personally, strongly believe that saving them from extinction is worthwhile no matter how much resources we have to allocate.
In the first place, it is obvious that animals are an indispensable part of the ecosystem that is a key factor to biodiversity. Therefore, the natural balance could be destroyed if there is one kind of animal completely disappearing since the other species preying on them, as a result, suffers from the risk of extinction, too. Someone would argue that it is a normal evolution code of the nature that human has no role to interfere, however, we are undoubtedly living all together in this universe, how could we ignore this widespread deduction?
With regard to scare resources, there is a common belief that they should be used wisely to tackle the population’s problems such as health care and poverty, I would claim that preserving animals is advantageous to human’s lives. Firstly, the fact that successes of scientific breakthroughs have been attributed to experiments on animals is undeniable. Thousands of lives have been saved from malaria, for example, thanks to antibiotics after being experimented on monkeys. Furthermore, researches in different kinds of animals could enable our deeper understanding of human evolution, furthering advance innovations. The finding that the human’s ancestors were chimpanzees millions of years ago has revolutionized the science field, opening the door to researches on human brains as well as cognitive skills.
By way of conclusion, as preventing endangered animals from mass extinction is, by no means, insurmountable, people should carry out feasible measures on this issue as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work andcommunicateviatheinternetwithoutface-to-facecommunication.Isitapositiveornegativedevelopment 89
- These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in thecity.Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city ) andsuggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 84
- Some people think all lawbreakers should be put into prison, while others believethat there are better alternatives. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and makecomparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... extinction is worthwhile no matter how much resources we have to allocate. In the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ures on this issue as soon as possible.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, with regard to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48611111111 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21428020282 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.42153914 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.636363636 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170194312706 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595574047878 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400751208061 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103742519762 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281528228082 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.