In the past, housework was considered to be women’s duty, so people usually took it for granted that women had to deal with all household chores without any help from other family members. Yet, with the increasing number of female employees in the workforce, some people challenge the traditional thinking that women should take care of all housework. In my opinion, I completely agree with this gender-equal idea to a large extent for two reasons.
To begin with, it is unfair to impose the burden of all housework on women, for their roles in modern society have changed tremendously over the years. No longer are women confined to the traditional role of doing all maid-like drudgery at home. Since it is difficult for a single wage-earner to support a family, the majority of women today have sought full-time jobs to supplement their household income. Just like their fathers or husbands, women devote most of their time to their work during the daytime and suffer from considerably higher levels of work-related stress and anxiety; therefore, they deserve proper rest after a day’s hard work as men do. Nevertheless, if these career women are heavily burdened with the housework tasks after work, they might be overwhelmed with fatigue and stress, eventually compromising their physical and mental health.
Additionally, splitting household duties evenly can create a harmonious family relationship. For example, if parents share housework responsibilities, this will have two positive effects on their family. First, children will realize that women or mothers are not synonymous with housework, with each family member responsible for doing it. Second, sharing housework is an effective way to show affection and care to beloved families. A husband can make his wife aware of his love to her if he is willing to do the dishes after each meal. Likewise, a boy can show his care to his mother or sisters if he does the laundry from time to time. Given that housework sharing has the potential to strengthen the family bond or enhance a marital relationship, it is justifiable to argue that both genders ought to fulfill their housework responsibilities.
To recapitulate, gone are the days when women are imposed on all housework. Nowadays, each family member should do housework because it can relieve women of their burden and foster a gender-friendly environment. Hence, it is reasonable for both genders to share household chores.
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Dis 56
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they should be given more time to do whatever they want 70
- the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- The graph shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18639798489 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92949377416 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581863979849 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2531841829 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.388888889 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0555555556 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12860542215 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466296496215 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248479157913 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786476740085 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203558726416 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.