Traditional schooling is out of date, boring and stifles a child's natural talents, various professionals have pushed for an education revolution. Are there alternatives in the education systems? Is traditional education doing more harm than good?
The current ways of teaching in schools is an issue of controversy. Older teaching methods are out-dated and sometimes hinder the innate development of students. Many proponents of modern education have strived for a radical overhaul of the current education paradigm. There are possible amendments that can be implemented in the contemporary schooling system to bring desired changes, as the amateur system is malicious.
Two primary amendments that can be introduced are technology-based education and more practical and real-time techniques. Modern schools should use a more tech-based curriculum. As more pupils are computer literate and use gadgets in their real life, Education boards should exercise high-tech methods instead of older books based education. For example- education policymakers should focus on eBooks and computers to deliver lectures and assignments, which will be more adaptable for children. Moreover, teachers and professors should adopt the modern practical delivery approach. For instance, schools can benefit students by demonstrating theories in labs as compared to just writing them in books.
Old school education is a deterrent towards the current and future students as it is not enough to keep pace with ever-changing technology and ideology of the general public. For example, most schools prohibit their attendees from bringing cellphones in their premises. However, Students in today's society are more intrigued towards smartphones than older-style books. The moratorium on mobile phones makes students less interested in studies. Colleges and schools should find rational ways so that they can create enthusiasm among the young generation.
To encapsulate, I think, by doing necessary adjustments and improvements in the teaching policies, modern policymakers can envisage more efficient schooling systems for future generations.
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate. Which do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 61
- Crime is a big problem in the world; many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion 56
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree. 78
- Do copyright laws limit creativity or reward it? Would society function better without such rules and regulations? 73
- Traditional schooling is out of date, boring and stifles a child’s natural talents, various professionals have pushed for an education revolution. Are there alternatives in the education system? Is traditional education doing more harm than good? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., as the amateur system is malicious. Two primary amendments that can be intro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpared to just writing them in books. Old school education is a deterrent towa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...changing technology and ideology of the general public. For example, most schools prohibit the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nthusiasm among the young generation. To encapsulate, I think, by doing necess...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87545787546 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03997085543 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608058608059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4491852157 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231262230902 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726151483741 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517660627921 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142033833471 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459673631429 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.