Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
There is an issue about the balance between income and spare time. Some sociologists argue that people should concentrate on big salaries regardless of the leisure time scarcity, while others think that spare time is more valuable than big wages. This essay will discuss both opinions and agree with the idea of the value of spare time.
Let us start with the reasons why some sociologists claim that earning more but possessing less leisure time is more beneficial. The first reason is that it provides a high standard of living. People with large salaries can afford a big house, a car as well as go on holidays once a year, so that they never think about living poverty. Another cause is that middle-class people can deposit more money for retirement. Workers with high income can secure a comfortable old age, when they have paid all the bills. Furthermore, earning a high wage allow people to support relatives. They may make a financial backing to their, for example, either parents or siblings when they experience difficulties.
However, other sociologists argue that working a lot for better salary is less important than having more free time. They justify this point of view by the following arguments. First of all, people have more enjoyable time with the family. Workaholics often suffer from shortage of time devoted to their children, while those, who are less obsessed with work, are delighted at the balance of work and family life, no matter how much they could earn income. Secondly, it allows people to do other activities as part of daily routine. Parents, who spend less time at work, can do other things, such as going to the gym and decorating the apartments. Finally, it enables people to travel around the world. Employees with temporary jobs can plan more interesting holidays in other parts of the globe.
In conclusion, although some sociologists advocate the idea of sacrificing free time for gaining larger incomes, I think that people should enjoy their life rather than have a complete commitment to work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | Jaskaran Kaur | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-07 | Mariamirabella | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | Tolik | 62 | view |
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 91
- A friend from another country is moving to your city for work He has asked you for advice about living in your city Write a letter to your friend In your letter suggest an interesting part of the city to live in describe the public transport in your city 89
- Increasing numbers of students are choosing to study abroad. To what extent does this trend benefit the students themselves and the countries involved? What are the drawbacks? 61
- Some employers() want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 73
- A friend you met last year has invited you to visit him/her in his/her country. You have never been there before and need some information before you leave.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:request advise about a gift for his/her familyask abo 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f living. People with large salaries can afford a big house, a car as well as go ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99122807018 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53302289491 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581871345029 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.72491582 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8421052632 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321309797343 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929687348152 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940749648937 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185618675783 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482093017476 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.