Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their own styles.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While it is argued that it should be the same architectural design for both new and old houses, others think that the owners should be let free to decide it. Although following the old style is preservation efforts on local values, I believe that it is private property and be built for their comfort.
Some would argue that constructing a new house in a common style help preserving the distinctive architecture and cultural values in the locality. If the conservation process is doing well, it will draw more tourists to these places due to its outstanding historic values. For example, the Old Quarter Hanoi, which is the historic civic urban core of this city, has a worldwide reputation for a range of traditional buildings and is visited by millions of travellers every year. However, I believe that individuals should have the freedom to decide that suitable style for their houses.
On the other hand, others think that the owners should have the right to choose the architectural style for their houses because they have the property right and it should follow the social and technological development. The modern style brings convenience, comfort, and safety for the homeowners rather than the traditional style. For instance, the modern house in Japan can stay firmly after an earthquake with its cutting-edge technology while the traditional one fails to do it. Moreover, I believe that the house also demonstrates the owners’ character and aesthetic taste as their assets.
In conclusion, although following the common house style is a way of conserving local values, I believe that the home-owner should be free to construct their house to maximize utilities and comfort.
- You recently missed a job interview for a managerial position at a well-known company in your city.Write a letter to the owner of the company. In your letter:Apologise for missing the interviewExplain what happened.Requested another appointment for the in 73
- You are studying in a large town where there are no leisure facilities for young people. Write a letter to the local council. In your letter:Describe the problemMake some suggestions for leisure facilitiesSay why you think that these facilities will make 78
- Government should limit the number of hours a person can work to 35 per week.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Although it was a difficult decision to make, you have decided to submit your resignation to your manager.Write a letter to your manager- Explain why you have decided to leave the company- Describe why the decision was difficult to make- Suggest a current 11
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free.What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a common style" with adverb for "common"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uld argue that constructing a new house in a common style help preserving the distinctive archite...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to preserve' or 'preserve'.
Suggestion: to preserve; preserve
...ting a new house in a common style help preserving the distinctive architecture and cultur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85284618565 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539855072464 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.5460048386 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.636363636 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300782542943 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118623163571 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814516324301 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199777898879 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405870732779 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.