Some people think that they have right to use as much fresh water as they want. Others think government should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is limited source. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, the issue of how to use fresh water properly has been more and more debatable among societies. Some people take into account that fresh water is freely to use for all human beings, while others believe this limited source should be controlled by government. Discussed more in this essay will these both sides of arguments be, as I will give the concluding view.
On the one hand, those who advocate the right of water usage point out that the policy of restricting fresh water use seems to violate the human’s right. By this means that fresh water, with which all people could fulfil their essential daily needs such as drinking, washing and bathing, is a public resource originated from the nature, coming from the river and rain. Therefore, it is undeniable fact that it is supposed to be uncontrolled strictly. Additionally, agricultural sectors utterly require a lot of water for its irrigation system, thereby limiting this access would probably make this field suffer. Consequently, not only would this dismiss farmers from their job but also a state would face the lack of food issue.
On the other hand, the opponents of this view cite that to impose the water consumption, especially executed by government, would probably gain benefits due to shortage of water in the future people will face. This is likely to cut down the activity of excessive water use, for example washing car more than twice a day. Moreover, by doing this, the authoritiy could control water properly, such as for watering plants, that this might bring long-term benefit. Moreover, it is essential to manage the water consumption equally. This policy would help less areas, in which inhabitants face a lack of water situation, by distributing clean water from the abundant water areas to that areas.
Overall, it seems to me that controlling the use of water is more preferable to accessing it freely, for it could help people in the different area to survive from lacking of water and to avoid excessive water consumption. Of course, it is provided that government still gives the accessibility to people based on their needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-13 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 84
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 84
- the graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be controlled by government. Discussed more in this essay will these both side...
^^
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overnment. Discussed more in this essay will these both sides of arguments be, a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, while, as to, for example, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02140672783 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65028424585 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571865443425 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5633156437 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31795905999 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112509785601 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635394965229 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215240359329 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390977869121 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.