University should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Do you agree or disagree?
To make an equal educational opportunity between men and women, the enrolment system based on the equal number of sex in every discipline in the higher education institutions is supposed to be implemented. I believe that this could bring some benefits to some extent, and explained more below will be the reasons.
Perhaps, the primary reason is that accepting students based on equal sex in the university could reduce the gender discrimination issues and stereotype in some states. Because, recently some women mostly still face difficulty to attain the university. This is caused by the old-believed traditions –patriarchy system– cultivated in local societies, which men are as a dominant sex in all sectors, while women have no power to endeavour to work as high as men, particularly studying in higher education level. If they got the chance to study, it is considered that female could be having more superior position rather than male. Fundamentally, however, it is undeniable fact that women have an equitable educational right as the men do. Additionally, it can be said that it is an acceptable way to make a balance in a class. By this means that some subjects, like engineering class, outnumbered by men could become female students surely uncomfortable. Thus, being parity with the men number would likely decrease sexual harassment in class.
Admittedly, I agree with those arguing that the idea of gender equality in all subjects is an impractical concept, as students practically have different interested courses. Nevertheless, such idea could enlarge new job opportunities either to men or women.
Overall, it seems reasonable to accept the same number of students in a college based on its gender in every discipline, due to its advantages, such as overcoming the old stereotype of gender and creating a balance study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-18 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | duckhiem2002 | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-02 | Khiet Nhi_0609 | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | minhchau2205 | 73 | view |
| 2015-01-02 | nguyenkhaccuong | 85 | view |
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 73
- With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musician and painters. What are the things artist can do but the scientists cannot? Why should we encourage the art area? 89
- Today the internet and TV have created chance for ordinary people to become famous. Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- The chart shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n issues and stereotype in some states. Because, recently some women mostly still face ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evertheless, such idea could enlarge new job opportunities either to men or women...
^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of gender and creating a balance study.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26262626263 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05431934626 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6928817422 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16210041127 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519764634543 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404422020165 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918641722717 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151196453573 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.