Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an issue about the influence of oil price on the ecology. Some ecologists suggest boosting the oil price in order to improve the poor condition of the environment. This essay disagrees with this opinion.
Let us start with the reasons why some ecologists state that a rise in the fuel price will become beneficial for the environment. The first reason is that the number of cars running on petrol will decline. Most drivers will not be able to fill their vehicles with gasoline, because the price will soar and become prohibitively high. Another reason is that alternative sources of energy will gain popularity. The car industry will drop significantly due to the growth of oil price, so many car manufacturers will start developing new types of engines, which operates on either hydrogen or solar electricity. Furthermore, traditional automobiles will become economical. Vehicle producers will also transform existing conventional engines into energy efficient, so that driver will be able to fill two times less fuel than usual, which will reduce harmful fumes in the atmosphere.
However, some scientists of global warming argue that high cost of petrol will aggravate environmental pollution. Firstly, most oil companies will supply the energy market with more fuel. The higher the price for oil is, the more areas of oil companies will start to develop, so many investors will choose to invest in petroleum market rather than in alternative energy. Petroleum producers will also hamper the development of alternative engines. They may create a great deal of obstacles to green-energy companies, because they will be reluctant to lose their share in the fuel industry. The complete replacement of traditional cars will linger for long time. The majority car drivers, who are usually poor people, will not quit their cars immediately for ecofriendly ones, so the improvement of air quality will stretch for many years.
In conclusion, although some ecologists advocate that expensive petroleum will help to alleviate the situation with polluted ecology, I think that it will only exacerbate it for the above mentioned reasons.
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both and give your opinion. 84
- Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may lead to the extinction of animal life and human life To what extent to you agree of disagree 11
- It is a common aspiration among many young people to run their own business rather than work for an employer Do you think the advantages of working for yourself outweigh the drawbacks 87
- Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products. What problems does it cause? What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30205278592 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82049242936 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560117302053 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2031216358 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0607326318583 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272397655074 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040394640338 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493541823915 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134841281486 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.