Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. Recently another anthropologist, Dr. Karp, visited the group of islands that includes Tertia and used the interview-centered method to study child-rearing practices. In the interviews that Dr. Karp conducted with children living in this group of islands, the children spent much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. Dr. Karp decided that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture must be invalid. Some anthropologists recommend that to obtain accurate information on Tertian child-rearing practices, future research on the subject should be conducted via the interview-centered method.
The anthropologist Dr. Karp claims that Dr.Field’s observation centered approach in determining child-rearing in Tertia is invalid and his approach of interview-centered approach provides a more accurate understanding. Although his claim seems plausible, it is based on assumptions that are either flawed or needs further validation. Unless Dr. Karp conduct further studies to back his assumptions, his claim remains invalid.
The first assumption that Dr.Karp draws is that child-rearing remains the same throughout time. Dr. Field had concluded that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than their own biological parents. However, his published his conclusion twenty years ago. It’s not uncommon for traditions or even policies to change in a long period of time. For example, China used to enforce a one-child policy - all married couples can only have one child. Now after several decades, the government removed that policy and encourages couples to have two children. it’s entirely possible that the governor of Tertia see the positives of biologial parents raising their own children, and encouraged residents of the Tertia to spend more time with their own children rather than other people’s children. Had Dr.Karp provided more evidence on Tertia’s political atmosphere or traditions changes, this claim will have more credibility.
The other flaw of Dr. Karp’s claim is that the scope of his interview or survey is not clear. We don’t know the scale for the survey or the sample size of the participants. It’s likely that only a handful of the people provided insights to the interviewers and not the entire population. In statistics, surveys are only accurate and provide a more comprehensive view if the sample size is large enough, diverse, and the questions are unbiased. This brings to another point that although the Tertia children said they spend more time talking to their biological parents, does that mean they are not reared by the rest of the village? Is it because they like to talk to their biological parents more and also receive care from other people? The biased question mislead the researchers into thinking that the children in Tertia are only reared by their own parents. It will strengthen the argument if the survey asked whether the children spent time at all with people who are not their parents in the village.
In addition, dr.Karp’s claim that understanding of child rearing in Tertia provides insight to child rearing traditions in other island cultures is invalid. True that we can often draw parallels between similar cultures because they share a lot of traditions. However, we don’t know for sure if Tertia’s child rearing culture is unique or it’s common in island cultures. For example, there’s one culture that is known for eating human flesh, but it’s unique and nearby tribes do not practice the same. We cannot just draw conclusion that because the two cultures are similar or they are close geographically, they will share the same practice. It requires more research in other island cultures to determine whether they have the same child-rearing traditions.
Although Dr.Karp offered several points in his claim that Tertia’s children are raised by their own biological parents, different from what Dr. Field had proposed, his conclusion is based on assumptions that lack valid evidence or fell into the trap of logical fallacies. Therefore, he needs to provide further research findings to back his statements.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 55
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infa 29
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 69
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/story/gre-argument-essay-topic-21-outline
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 566 350
No. of Characters: 2870 1500
No. of Different Words: 250 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.878 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.071 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.671 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 217 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 168 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 107 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.769 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.333 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.385 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.481 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field&apos
... anthropologist Dr. Karp claims that Dr.Field's observation centered approach in dete...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...valid. The first assumption that Dr.Karp draws is that child-rearing remains the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ns or even policies to change in a long period of time. For example, China used to enforce a o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It&apos
...ncourages couples to have two children. it's entirely possible that the governor o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...an other people's children. Had Dr.Karp provided more evidence on Tertia's...
^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp&apos
...nts in the village. In addition, dr.Karp's claim that understanding of child rea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e the same child-rearing traditions. Although Dr.Karp offered several points in his c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...hild-rearing traditions. Although Dr.Karp offered several points in his claim tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 13.6137724551 140% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 28.8173652695 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3017.0 2260.96107784 133% => OK
No of words: 559.0 441.139720559 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39713774597 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.56307096286 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93205313505 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 204.123752495 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457960644007 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 906.3 705.55239521 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2165953365 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.740740741 119.503703932 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7037037037 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81481481481 5.70786347227 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.67664670659 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262127444807 0.218282227539 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074684661829 0.0743258471296 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904386902443 0.0701772020484 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157087294817 0.128457276422 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722072125166 0.0628817314937 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 98.500998004 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.