Number of men and women in different evening courses
The bar chart illustrates the number of men and women enrolled in four different evening courses at an adult education institution in the year 2009, while the pie chart displays the proportion of different age groups.
Overall, it is witnessed that number of females joined in various courses were high except in the sculpture course. On the other hand, it can be seen that the proportion of the elderly group was the highest as compared to the proportion of the young group.
To commence with, the number of females who took admission in Drama was 20 which was double than the number of males in the same class. In Painting course, both the genders showed more interest, 25 were females and 30 were males. However, Sculpture course was failed to attract the aspirants. 20 females in comparison with 10 males. On the other hand, Language course attracted the highest females. The number was 40 which was double than males.
Looking towards pie chart, 42% of people who belong to the age group of 50 or over, showed the highest interest in enrolling different evening courses. Whereas, the percentage of registrations of the age group under 20 was at 5%, which was the least.
- movie making budget 11
- Generation of Electricity through Hydro Electric Power station 73
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 61
- Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84236453202 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48500562951 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7764505838 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3636363636 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263814493073 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891452270778 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109869563133 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16776062921 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135941703799 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.