the bar graphs show the number of people who were affected by noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2017
The bar charts compare how many people in urban and rural areas were affected by noise
pollution from four sources during daytime and nightime in 2007.
Overall, it is clear that more people in cities experienced all types of noise pollution
compared with rural areas. In both charts, traffic was the main source of noise pollution
at all times.
Daytime noise from traffic affected 64 million people in cities and 34 million in rural
areas. At night, traffic noise affected 48 million city residents, double the figure for rural
areas. Noise pollution caused by trains affected slightly more people in cities compared
with rural areas, at 10 million and 8 million respectively during the daytime, and 8
million and 6 million respectively at night.
The remaining two sources of noise pollution were less significant. In cities, daytime
aircraft noise affected 4 million people and half that number in rural areas. The figure at
night for cities and rural areas was 1 million. Those living in rural areas were not
affected by noise from industry. However, 1 million city residents experienced industrial
noise pollution in the daytime, four times the number affected at night
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 77
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate withPeople via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 74
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 61
- The bar graph illustrates the proportion of Americans ate in fast food establishments over a period of ten years from 2003 to 2013. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22279792746 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44719803494 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445595854922 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7535702438 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6363636364 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398173305685 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204017407805 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548809154396 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179033938077 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913734793435 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.