Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and
poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion
While a number of people believe that economic development is the only solution to the global problem of hunger and poverty, the others often said that because of the growth of economy has detrimental effects on the environment, it must be ended. This essay will discuss both views of this point and give my opinion.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of the growth of the economy brought include hunger and poverty. First, when the economic growth means higher living standard. It leads to increase incomes and lift people out of extreme poverty. Also, economic growth may bring advanced tax incomes for the government. Because of this, the treasury of the government will increase means they have to allocate resources to many areas that may resolve social issues such as public welfare, social service, health care free.
On the other hand, economic growth never separated from environmental issues. Firstly, the rapid growth of production and consumption may create pollution issues such as sound and air and water pollution. For instance, the more and more industrial companies, the more waste toxic chemical are discharged into rivers. In addition, with increasing environmental damage bring negative effects on the quality of human life. For example, when the atmosphere is contaminated, the health of people in that area will be affected.
In conclusion, although economic development might bring several benefits to solve hunger and poverty issues, it seems to me that the costs of economic growth on the environment are also high.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | hplong93 | 61 | view |
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 61
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate withPeople via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different purpose in 6 areas of the world. 67
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day and seven days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should beoffered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary educationto those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.248 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61746747831 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5827665235 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.923076923 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290512260047 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097288817576 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743259693477 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184613581273 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738170855735 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.